Endless Paradigm

The only picture I have that doesn't appear fugly when compressed in Vita.

Also looks much better on Vita, the screenshot appears washed out or something :s

My motorola atrix 4g i just got cheap. Tegra2 powered is awesomesauce.
Also heres a quadrant score i got with it running ICS. :p

I thought the older 1GHz Tegra 2 CPU was comparable to a 1GHz TI OMAP 4430 processor.  Galaxy Nexus uses a TI OMAP 4460 clocked at 1.2GHz, so should have a higher score?

EDIT: Tegra 2 also doesn't support NEON, whereas the OMAP4 does...

Lunar was right about the screenshots looking better on the Vita itself :S

Uh the Vita can play psp games? I thought it could only play its own games.

-UrbanHybrid23- Wrote: [ -> ]Uh the Vita can play psp games? I thought it could only play its own games.

You can download PSP games from the PSN Store and play them.

ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]I thought the older 1GHz Tegra 2 CPU was comparable to a 1GHz TI OMAP 4430 processor.  Galaxy Nexus uses a TI OMAP 4460 clocked at 1.2GHz, so should have a higher score?

EDIT: Tegra 2 also doesn't support NEON, whereas the OMAP4 does...

My Atrix 4g vs Galaxy Nexus i think i have the better GPU lol as the Nexus uses the same one from the Galaxy S just slightly better.
But still Atrix 4g was one of the first dual-core phones.
Nahh its just items were not optimized but with better roms on development its more stable and that benchmark was on a Beta version of Androids Ice Cream Sandwich with phone clocked at 1.45ghz the score is almost the same as HTC's new quad-core.

At 1.35ghz it gets 4100+

Also can't believe sony still don't use andy AA in XMB seriously with its quad-core cpu and better gpu it wouldnt harm it much but improve viewing quality.

I can't hit 4000 with my Nexus. Although I am using a battery efficient kernel. I'll try later with a performance one.

squee666 Wrote: [ -> ]My Atrix 4g vs Galaxy Nexus i think i have the better GPU lol as the Nexus uses the same one from the Galaxy S just slightly better.

From what I read, a few months back, there aren't many GPUs more powerful than the Nexus GPU though - only the SGSII and iPhone 4S GPUs were more powerful.
That's what I picked up from some random forum post, so have no idea how accurate that is.

squee666 Wrote: [ -> ]Also can't believe sony still don't use andy AA in XMB seriously with its quad-core cpu and better gpu it wouldnt harm it much but improve viewing quality.

Arguably, at higher pixel densities, AA/smoothing isn't so important.  Judging screenshots at monitor DPI may cause things to look bad - I suppose the only real way of seeing how good it really looks is to actually look at it on the device itself.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/4177/samsu...enchmarked

Yea Tegra is on par with Mali. Google skimped on their nexus again and made it flagship only mainly because of ICS.

Samsung Galaxy Nexus uses the same CPU as my phone.
But uses the old PowerVR SGX540 or a rumored SGX544 which is seperate.

By the way PowerVR SGX is the slightly better version GPU as my old Nokia N900 which was out in August 2009 so its quite outdated.

Mines all on one chip. Tegra 3 phones this year are going to ridiculous.