Endless Paradigm

Full Version: Youtube 4k - stupidest thing ever?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Senseito7 Wrote: [ -> ]
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]
Senseito7 Wrote: [ -> ]You can make MPC-HC rather portable. You probably know the latest builds only seem to be available at http://x264.nl , get that one.
Actually, latest (SVN) builds, get them from here: http://www.xvidvideo.ru/media-player-cla...ma-x86-x64 (Russian + English site, don't get freaked out by the former)
SourceForge build is r1249.

the one on x264 is 1301. Custom build?
Didn't realise they had a build on there (only saw the SourceForge link).  Silly me.
Personally, I'm using MPlayer (with the SMPlayer GUI) as my portable media player.  Using a special build of MPlayer that is patched to support ordered chapters.

But yeah, I guess it's worth a try making MPC-HC portable, as I like it's GUI the best.
Assassinator Wrote: [ -> ]
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote: [ -> ]
  • Many CPUs can't decode it without lag (especially going to slow Flash); I suspect it will choke all but the best Core 2's, but I can't seem to find reliable results

  • I suspect it'll probably lag on all (not-overclocked) core2s besides the core2quads.



    Also, I confirmed that CoreAVC breaks on youtube 4k.  Others are having the same problem.

    I have a core 2 quad q9550 not overclocked or anything. Youtube 4k is just barely too much to run perfectly smooth. If I kill a few processes that are using it a little, then it's smooth. It's not my graphics card, its cpu.
    6 years later.. 4k content not worth the extra time and work due to Youtube's bottlenecking (as far as resolution goes, you do get higher bitrate when selecting 4k)

    Source: YouTube
    On the flip side:
    - Many Intel CPUs from the last ~5 years can decode 4K fine
    - Hardware 4K H.265 decoders exist these days, though I don't think Youtube uses H.265
    - Internet bandwidth is increasing, depending on where you live in the world, but probably not enough
    -» Google's next gen codecs (VP10) may help with this, but I doubt much (codecs get better compression ratio but increase computational costs; with CPUs not getting faster these days, there's somewhat a limit to how slow you can make a codec)

    Still mostly pointless IMO, but barriers to 4K are going down (which was pretty much expected).  I don't see 8K adoption any time soon, or even in a few years' time.

    Looking back 6 years... yeah, pretty much the bigger = better mentality.
    Pages: 1 2 3 4
    Reference URL's