11/10/2009, 09:33 PM
11/10/2009, 10:06 PM
ameer Wrote:I think im the only person on ep who uses Opera :P
eww.
lol.
11/10/2009, 10:07 PM
and i may be the only one who uses both firefox and seamonkey?
11/10/2009, 11:38 PM
I have Opera for viewing Flash stuff; Firefox x64 handles normal browsing.
Sensei probably has screwy plugins, lol.
I recall a test showing Firefox 3.5 generally uses less RAM than Chrome, however I'm skeptical over these things, but it should at least demonstrate that you don't get stuff like 1TB for a single tab with no add-ons.
Your 50% usage (2 CPU cores?) also helps support my theory :P
Sensei probably has screwy plugins, lol.
I recall a test showing Firefox 3.5 generally uses less RAM than Chrome, however I'm skeptical over these things, but it should at least demonstrate that you don't get stuff like 1TB for a single tab with no add-ons.
Your 50% usage (2 CPU cores?) also helps support my theory :P
12/10/2009, 12:35 AM
Xitherun Wrote:Chrome for the win.
237MB with 10 Tabs Open ;D
hell if Chrome is for nubcakes, im a clever nubcake
12/10/2009, 12:40 AM
ProperBritish Wrote:Xitherun Wrote:Chrome for the win.
237MB with 10 Tabs Open ;D
hell if Chrome is for nubcakes, im a clever nubcake
237MB for 10 tabs is way more than Firefox. Don't compare it to Sensei, his case is not normal.
79MB with 7 tabs.
12/10/2009, 12:51 AM
Xitherun Wrote:Chrome's got addons.
http://www.chromeplugins.org/extensions/...extension/
no where as good as firegestures.
Assassinator Wrote:Heartless141 Wrote:i don't think i can live without a few firefox addon, mostly firegesture.
hmmm is there any other browser support addons?
I've never even heard of that...
Anyway, there was a thread ages ago for that.
http://endlessparadigm.com/forum/showthr...p?tid=3805
Ima bump it.
it's a really useful one. give it a go. :p
12/10/2009, 12:52 AM
can you see how much each tab is using? No you can't, FXnoob.
also, FX's UI is clunky as hell.
also, FX's UI is clunky as hell.
12/10/2009, 01:19 AM
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:I have Opera for viewing Flash stuff; Firefox x64 handles normal browsing.
Sensei probably has screwy plugins, lol.
I recall a test showing Firefox 3.5 generally uses less RAM than Chrome, however I'm skeptical over these things, but it should at least demonstrate that you don't get stuff like 1TB for a single tab with no add-ons.
Your 50% usage (2 CPU cores?) also helps support my theory :P
Cooliris, Skype Plugin (not sure why I actually have that), Firebug, FDM Intergration.
That's it as far as I know..
Xitherun Wrote:also, FX's UI is clunky as hell.
I can't believe you're trying to say that.
12/10/2009, 01:37 AM
Xitherun Wrote:can you see how much each tab is using? No you can't, FXnoob.That's kinda actually bad. If Chrome uses complete multi-processes, then there's little shared memory (DLLs will still be shared, but nothing else) = memory wastage. Firefox's design allows reusage between tabs.
Either that, or Chrome's reporting isn't that accurate.
Senseito7 Wrote:Cooliris, Skype Plugin (not sure why I actually have that), Firebug, FDM Intergration.Try running in Safe Mode.
That's it as far as I know..
17 tabs, x64 version of Firefox (which should use more memory than 32-bit):
Plus all these plugins http://endlessparadigm.com/forum/showthr...#pid250406
Do have images disabled, which could help usage