How long was it for?
Logs are showing me this:
Quote:Oct 6 16:43:07 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:09 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:15 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:16 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:34 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:36 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:51 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:56 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:45:55 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:55:08 zingaburga shutdown[1521]: shutting down for system halt
Oct 6 16:55:24 zingaburga exiting on signal 15
Oct 6 19:37:53 zingaburga syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
I'm guessing the restart occurred because the host's connection was screwy (have a script which tries to reboot if there's no network connection). What I don't get was why it took 2:42 to reboot... (anyone know more about Linux here? perhaps some logging quirk? unless the host decided to shut the system down, lol)
Web server logs show connections at 16:43:05 and 19:38:22, so should be fairly indicative of when people weren't able to access stuff.
I recall checking uptime about a week ago, and was up for like 87 days. Weird quirk I guess >_>
I would assume that it could be something routine...Maybe they just do it to clear out cache or something. Then again, I don't really know much about servers.
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:How long was it for?
Logs are showing me this:
Quote:Oct 6 16:43:07 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:09 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:15 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:16 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:34 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:36 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:51 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:56 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:45:55 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:55:08 zingaburga shutdown[1521]: shutting down for system halt
Oct 6 16:55:24 zingaburga exiting on signal 15
Oct 6 19:37:53 zingaburga syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
I'm guessing the restart occurred because the host's connection was screwy (have a script which tries to reboot if there's no network connection). What I don't get was why it took 2:42 to reboot... (anyone know more about Linux here? perhaps some logging quirk? unless the host decided to shut the system down, lol)
Web server logs show connections at 16:43:05 and 19:38:22, so should be fairly indicative of when people weren't able to access stuff.
I recall checking uptime about a week ago, and was up for like 87 days. Weird quirk I guess >_>
these look like linux logs...
It's not worth running a Windows server...
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:How long was it for?
Logs are showing me this:
Quote:Oct 6 16:43:07 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:09 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:15 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:16 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:34 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:36 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:51 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:56 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:45:55 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:55:08 zingaburga shutdown[1521]: shutting down for system halt
Oct 6 16:55:24 zingaburga exiting on signal 15
Oct 6 19:37:53 zingaburga syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
I'm guessing the restart occurred because the host's connection was screwy (have a script which tries to reboot if there's no network connection). What I don't get was why it took 2:42 to reboot... (anyone know more about Linux here? perhaps some logging quirk? unless the host decided to shut the system down, lol)
Web server logs show connections at 16:43:05 and 19:38:22, so should be fairly indicative of when people weren't able to access stuff.
I recall checking uptime about a week ago, and was up for like 87 days. Weird quirk I guess >_>
Yeah IMO that looks like the main link had problems ~ no connection = no void etc.
Ah well. ^^
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:How long was it for?
Logs are showing me this:
Quote:Oct 6 16:43:07 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:09 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:15 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:16 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:34 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:36 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:43:51 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:43:56 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link up.
Oct 6 16:45:55 zingaburga kernel: eth0: link down.
Oct 6 16:55:08 zingaburga shutdown[1521]: shutting down for system halt
Oct 6 16:55:24 zingaburga exiting on signal 15
Oct 6 19:37:53 zingaburga syslogd 1.4.1: restart.
I'm guessing the restart occurred because the host's connection was screwy (have a script which tries to reboot if there's no network connection). What I don't get was why it took 2:42 to reboot... (anyone know more about Linux here? perhaps some logging quirk? unless the host decided to shut the system down, lol)
Web server logs show connections at 16:43:05 and 19:38:22, so should be fairly indicative of when people weren't able to access stuff.
I recall checking uptime about a week ago, and was up for like 87 days. Weird quirk I guess >_>
so that cord.......was an Ethernet cord