Endless Paradigm

Full Version: Woman fined $1.9 million for downloading 24 songs
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3
Quote:(CNN)  -- A federal jury Thursday found a 32-year-old Minnesota woman guilty of illegally downloading music from the Internet and fined her $80,000 each -- a total of $1.9 million -- for 24 songs.

Jammie Thomas-Rasset's case was the first such copyright infringement case to go to trial in the United States, her attorney said.

Attorney Joe Sibley said that his client was shocked at the fine, noting that the price tag on the songs she downloaded was 99 cents.

She plans to appeal, he said.

Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America, said the association was "pleased that the jury agreed with the evidence and found the defendant liable."

"Wee appreciate the jury's service and that they take this as seriously as wee do," she said.

Thomas-Rasset downloaded work by artists such as No Doubt, Linkin Park, Gloria Estefan and Sheryl Crow.

This was the second trial for Thomas-Rasset. The judge ordered a retrial in 2007 after there was an error in the wording of jury instructions.

The fines jumped considerably from the first trial, which granted just $220,000 to the recording companies.

Thomas-Rasset is married with four children and works for an Indian tribe in Minnesota.
Source: cnn


How many songs have you downloaded?
1.9 million for 24 songs ? !

Something doesn't add up/
yeah I saw this on yahoo the other day, that must suck out of millions of people that download songs off the internet you're the one that gets caught.
ameer Wrote:1.9 million for 24 songs ? !

Something doesn't add up/

Well, 24×80000 = 1920000 = $1.92 million
omg... this is weird...

How many songs I have downloaded? Hmm.... my entire 25 GB collection? And growing..
Yeah, I saw this a while ago.  That number is seriously absurd IMO.
Still, makes the RIAA look like a bunch of retards - are they trying to scare people with these cases?  I recall, a few years back, a 12 year old girl being prosecuted for downloading a Wiggles song or something like that...
EDIT: here it is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/09/09/..._the_face/



Okay, I wasn't thinking when I wrote the above ^ :/
I guess this sort of thing does spread in the news to get the message across to people.
Still, I never knew you could be fined so much for copyright infringement.
Ow
My entire library is downloaded so. . .much more then her lol
So I got more than 180GB of music, how much is that when RIAA fines me?
patrck_744 Wrote:So I got more than 180GB of music, how much is that when RIAA fines me?

At 5MB a song. . .$2,949,120,000
At 7MB a song. . .$2,106,480,000
Well, the Supreme Court has ruled in a previous case that excessive fines were "Unconstitutional". Hopefully, this gets all the way to the Supreme Court, but somehow, I doubt it.

The RIAA mostly gets settlements from people, for an average of $3000 each. RIAA is a greedy corporation seeking people's money. When someone refuses a settlement, the RIAA just demands even more unreasonable amounts.
Pages: 1 2 3
Reference URL's