31/05/2009, 04:48 PM
Found an interesting article comparing how efficient various languages in terms of execution speed (performance) and development speed (ease of writing the code).
![[Image: size-vs-speed-vs-depandability---context---2-752149.png]](http://gmarceau.qc.ca/blog/uploaded_images/size-vs-speed-vs-depandability---context---2-752149.png)
Here's the overall chart:
http://gmarceau.qc.ca/blog/uploaded_imag...bility.png
Source
![[Image: size-vs-speed-vs-depandability---context---2-752149.png]](http://gmarceau.qc.ca/blog/uploaded_images/size-vs-speed-vs-depandability---context---2-752149.png)
Quote:If you drew the benchmark results on an XY chart you could name the four corners. The fast but verbose languages would cluster at the top left. Let's call them system languages. The elegantly concise but sluggish languages would cluster at the bottom right. Let's call them script languages. On the top right you would find the obsolete languages. That is, languages which have since been outclassed by newer languages, unless they offer some quirky attraction that is not captured by the data here. And finally, in the bottom left corner you would find probably nothing, since this is the space of the ideal language, the one which is at the same time fast and short and a joy to use.
Here's the overall chart:
http://gmarceau.qc.ca/blog/uploaded_imag...bility.png
Source