Endless Paradigm

Full Version: PENTAGON Computers Hacked
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
Quote:The $300 billion (£206bn) jet is being developed by Lockheed Martin and will be bought by eight other countries, including the UK.

However, the Wall Street Journal reported that hackers had broken into the project and siphoned off "several terabytes of data related to design and electronics systems".

The leak could make it easier to defend against the plane, also known as the F35 Lightning II. However, the spies could not access the most sensitive material, which is kept on computers that are not connected to the internet.

Former US officials said the attacks appear to have originated in China, but there is scant concrete evidence because it is easy to mask identities online.

Chinese officials reacted angrily to the accusation, and a spokesman for the foreign ministry said: "China has not changed its stance on hacking. China has always been against hacking and wee have cracked down very hard on hacking. This is not a Chinese phenomenon. It happens everywhere in the world."

Attacks on the Pentagon are common, but are said to have escalated dramatically in the past six months, and coincide with growing speculation about China's role in cyber espionage.

A report issued by the Pentagon last month said the Chinese military has made "steady progress" in its online warfare capabilities, a key field in which China can compete with the US.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington called the report "a product of the Cold War mentality" and said accusations of cyber crime were being spread to inflame opinion against China.

At the end of last month, researchers at several universities discovered the existence of GhostNet, a vast internet espionage network that was siphoning information from sensitive computers in 103 countries. One third of its targets were based in embassies, news media and NGOs. The researchers said the majority of GhostNet's attacks originated from within China but stopped short of accusing Beijing of responsibility.

The security of the Joint Strike Fighter may have been breached before, according to a Pentagon report in 2008. The report said that "the advanced aviation and weapons technology for the JSF programme may have been compromised" because the Defence Department had not kept a close enough eye on the 1,200 contractors involved in the mammoth process. At the time, BAE Systems, the UK arms company, was named as one contractor that might have allowed details to leak. BAE denied that any information on the jet had been compromised.

The UK intends to use the Joint Strike Fighter as a replacement for the Harrier jump jet. More than 2,400 jets will be built in total.

Source

Even a No0b IT Admin would detect those data being uploaded to somewhere. Goodjob Pentagon for hiring a lazy one. Aha
Lmao. FAIL.
Well of course the Pentagon is a target it's like saying
"Hey you i bet you can't hack the pentagon"
"Oh yeah well I bet you $300"
"Deal"
*that dude runs home and hacks the pentagon*
"I'd like my $300 bucks now"
*FBI brings him in for questioning*
*you never see him again*
Erk

and EPIC PHAILURE on MASS Proportions
Punk777E Wrote:Well of course the Pentagon is a target it's like saying
"Hey you i bet you can't hack the pentagon"
"Oh yeah well I bet you $300"
"Deal"
*that dude runs home and hacks the pentagon*
"I'd like my $300 bucks now"
*FBI brings him in for questioning*
*you never see him again*
Erk

and EPIC PHAILURE on MASS Proportions

Fail.
feinicks Wrote:Fail.

Epic Phail
FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail
trademark91 Wrote:FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FAIL?!?!?!
Punk777E Wrote:
trademark91 Wrote:FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FAIL?!?!?!

yes, FAIL.
trademark91 Wrote:
Punk777E Wrote:
trademark91 Wrote:FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FAIL?!?!?!

yes, FAIL.

You's a Failed ma class Nana-o
Punk777E Wrote:
trademark91 Wrote:
Punk777E Wrote:
trademark91 Wrote:FailFailFailFailFailFailFailFail

FAIL?!?!?!

yes, FAIL.

You's a Failed ma class Nana-o

no you's a failed my class.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's