18/01/2008, 03:49 PM
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
19/01/2008, 08:36 PM
I seem to have found a bug in the latest version of the program. It may just be a certain sequence of pixel data in this image that have a very slim chance of happening to anyone unless you're trying to do exactly what I was doing.
Puting this image:
![[Image: triangleShadowError.png]](http://www.rickadams.org/tim/triangleShadowError.png)
into RCO Editor produces THIS:
![[Image: RCOEditorError.jpg]](http://www.rickadams.org/tim/RCOEditorError.jpg)
After several recreations and remodifications of the shadow image, this works just fine:
![[Image: triangleShadow.png]](http://www.rickadams.org/tim/triangleShadow.png)
The difference is barely visible, but the lighter pixels made it apply through RCO Editor without the odd corruption.
Puting this image:
into RCO Editor produces THIS:
After several recreations and remodifications of the shadow image, this works just fine:
The difference is barely visible, but the lighter pixels made it apply through RCO Editor without the odd corruption.
10/02/2008, 09:04 AM
Tenshigami Wrote:I seem to have found a bug in the latest version of the program. It may just be a certain sequence of pixel data in this image that have a very slim chance of happening to anyone unless you're trying to do exactly what I was doing.
Puting this image:
into RCO Editor produces THIS:
After several recreations and remodifications of the shadow image, this works just fine:
The difference is barely visible, but the lighter pixels made it apply through RCO Editor without the odd corruption.
i oftenly encounter that problem, but found a way to get around it
16/02/2008, 05:22 AM
16/02/2008, 05:31 AM
16/02/2008, 06:32 AM
16/02/2008, 06:40 AM
16/02/2008, 06:08 PM
17/02/2008, 03:15 AM
20/02/2008, 07:27 AM