Endless Paradigm

Full Version: XFX Hits Mach Speeds with Overclocked 8800 Ultra
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
[Image: XFX%208800%20XXX.jpg]


[quote=I4U]  NVIDIA has been catching lots of heat on the release of their new top dog 8800 Ultra graphics card. The problem is that the stock clocked cards are outperformed in some cases by the overclocked 8800 GTX graphics cards, that are often much cheaper as well.

Of the three main NVIDIA card partners, XFX, EVGA, and BFG only XFX has announced an overclocked graphics card at this time. Even the seriously nice BFG 8800 Ultra water cooled edition carries the NVIDIA stock reference clocks.

XFX is stepping up to the plate and delivering the first overclocked 8800 Ultra graphics card which carries their XXX moniker marking it as one of the fastest graphics card you will find. XFX has set the core clock speed for the 8800 Ultra at 675MHz and the memory clock at 2.3GHz. Anytime you increase the core speed you also increase the shader clock, which on the XFX 8800 Ultra XXX is 1674MHz.

Alas, if you are wondering when you can buy this ultimate 8800 Ultra the only word I get is soon. As for the pricing of the XXX version, I can
Holy spoon that are some insane clock speeds

Quote:...marking it as one of the fastest graphics card you will find.

One of the? Ur donkey, The fastest graphics card you will find.
Indeed :)
:O @ price though...
lol
I love to hear news like this. ATI will respond with a better card, and then NVIDIA will in turn respond with an even faster card. Competition is a great thing. Point in case: Windows basically has no competition so it if full of bugs and poorly-coded.
what about mac os
Mac and Linux have such a small market share that they're really no competition. Microsoft used to threaten to pull support for PC makers like Dell and HP if they offered alternate OS's like Linux. Doing things like that, they have a stranglehold on the OS market.

If either OS were a viable option, they would cause prices to drop, better features to be developed, more stable builds, etc.

Less than 10% of computer users use Apple's OS. Apple would have to have closer to a 30% market share for them to be any real threat to MS.

Don't get me wrong, I like Apple and I think they'll be my next purchase, but they just aren't any real competition for MS.
i think apple did a good job stealing former-future-vista users from microsoft and because lots of ppl who wanted vista now got a mac they will be spreading the word too
maybe another 3 years and apple will have a significant market share

also don't forget that windows may have a much larger market share in general but that may be because it is used in all offices, if you count only home use apple does have a bigger market share (not bigger than windows but bigger than when you count everything including servers)

only small businesses like architects and photographers use macs professionally
I like the new apple commercials with a "mac and a PC" hahahaha they are funny
Double post
Source: YouTube
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's