22/03/2009, 06:28 AM
Pages: 1 2
22/03/2009, 06:28 AM
As you might have guessed, the other parts of this review will not be completed; however it will be fully done in the next testing which will have:
Firefox 3.6a1pre
Internet Explorer 8 Final
Firefox 3.1 Final
Edit: I'm just as curious as you'd be for that first one I noted - this test had the latest Alpha - 3.2a1pre... but this dialog speaks for itself:
![[Image: bfrw2b.png]](http://i42.tinypic.com/bfrw2b.png)
Why the massive Version Number upgrade?
Firefox 3.6a1pre
Internet Explorer 8 Final
Firefox 3.1 Final
Edit: I'm just as curious as you'd be for that first one I noted - this test had the latest Alpha - 3.2a1pre... but this dialog speaks for itself:
![[Image: bfrw2b.png]](http://i42.tinypic.com/bfrw2b.png)
Why the massive Version Number upgrade?
23/03/2009, 03:41 PM
i just did some superficial benchmarks with some linux browsers.
Arora and Midori, both are using webkit and are in early development.
SunSpider Benchmark:
Midori: 1186.6ms ± 1.3%
Arora: 1200.8ms ± 1.1%
Firefox: 2611.0ms ± 6.5%
V8 Benchmark Suite:
Midori: 832
Arora: 755
Firefox: 209
Oo
Arora and Midori, both are using webkit and are in early development.
SunSpider Benchmark:
Midori: 1186.6ms ± 1.3%
Arora: 1200.8ms ± 1.1%
Firefox: 2611.0ms ± 6.5%
V8 Benchmark Suite:
Midori: 832
Arora: 755
Firefox: 209
Oo
23/03/2009, 04:26 PM
you guys are not including the 64bit alternatives either
25/03/2009, 07:22 AM
bstronga Wrote:i just did some superficial benchmarks with some linux browsers.
Arora and Midori, both are using webkit and are in early development.
SunSpider Benchmark:
Midori: 1186.6ms ± 1.3%
Arora: 1200.8ms ± 1.1%
Firefox: 2611.0ms ± 6.5%
V8 Benchmark Suite:
Midori: 832
Arora: 755
Firefox: 209
Oo
Never heard of either of them, I doubt they will pass Chrome/Chromium or Safaris level of development though..
squee666 Wrote:you guys are not including the 64bit alternatives either
....... I don't think that's important...
Pages: 1 2