03/11/2008, 07:32 AM
03/11/2008, 08:17 AM
did you tampered it on say, photoshop or somewhere else?
and i say 2MP
and, double you tee eff @ you adding me on facebook O_O stalker!! :P
and i say 2MP
and, double you tee eff @ you adding me on facebook O_O stalker!! :P
03/11/2008, 09:00 AM
the flash is burning the cat's eyes.
03/11/2008, 09:03 AM
1.9 megapixels. image dimensions = 1600*1200=1,920,000 pixels
03/11/2008, 09:32 AM
Kaiser Wrote:did you tampered it on say, photoshop or somewhere else?
and i say 2MP
and, double you tee eff @ you adding me on facebook O_O stalker!! :P
XD can't add if you don't accept
lol international stalker
answer by the way the camera is 5MP non dslr
yes i ran it through the photoshops of cs4
original image by the way i did improve this by alot of detail
Spoiler:
03/11/2008, 03:55 PM
Wait, you two have Facebook? Send me links, I must add you as friends!
03/11/2008, 04:18 PM
metalgear08 Wrote:Wait, you two have Facebook? Send me links, I must add you as friends!
i lol'd
check your PM's
04/11/2008, 02:54 AM
Well, megapixels don't determine quality. So get over the megapixel myth. The thing that makes pictures look better from one another are the size and quality of sensors. The larger the size, the more space there is to use, the less noise in an image. Also Lenses play a good role in IQ. I know someone on flickr that printed a 4m(meter) x 4m image with a 6.1MP file. It's not about megapixels.
Sorry if this spoiled your fun
http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/dslrsenso...ensors.htm
Sorry if this spoiled your fun
http://www.sphoto.com/techinfo/dslrsenso...ensors.htm