R!KKU Wrote:im thinking of buying a slr iv seen a sony one idk what model but it was like 1'900 something it seemed pretty good
Sony is just new into the dSLR scene and IMO it's best to stick with brands that are more experienced in the field.
Vegetano1 Wrote:OMG,.!?
there is a difference between Canon and NIkon,.. i would never go for a Canon,.
Why?
I would never say I would ever go for a Nikon. Nikons are good I just prefer the IQ of Canons. Also I like the selection of lenses on the Canon side better.
But in terms of everything except price the Canon 5dmk2 trumps the d90.
Also in movie mode you have to go manual focus. Yes Nikon came out with the Video mode first but Canons looks very promising.
Vegetano1 Wrote:I like Nikon.
I like canon. But wouldn't mind owning a Nikon d700 :P
diego Wrote:R!KKU Wrote:im thinking of buying a slr iv seen a sony one idk what model but it was like 1'900 something it seemed pretty good
Sony is just new into the dSLR scene and IMO it's best to stick with brands that are more experienced in the field.
what diego said
Vegetano1 Wrote:OMG,.!?
there is a difference between Canon and NIkon,.. i would never go for a Canon,.
never is such a strong word :D
Though Sony does have the great lens maker Carl Zeiss on their hands.
But they are now coming out with a line with a canon mount so I am happy!
diego Wrote:OLD.
Canon has come out with the Canon 5d Mk2 after this and it is the first dSLR with 1080p HD video.
Canon 5d Mk2 > Nikon d90
qftmft.
If I had a spare $2700, I'd get the 5d Mk2 in a heartbeat.
metalgear08 Wrote:diego Wrote:OLD.
Canon has come out with the Canon 5d Mk2 after this and it is the first dSLR with 1080p HD video.
Canon 5d Mk2 > Nikon d90
qftmft.
If I had a spare $2700, I'd get the 5d Mk2 in a heartbeat.
If I had spare 2700 I would prolly get the 5d mk1 and get a couple of good primes because I don't really need video mode.