18/07/2008, 09:46 PM
Pages: 1 2
18/07/2008, 09:57 PM
^^ just remeber that using those settings its gonna take a while to encode even on a fast pc... exhaustive search is kinda overkill in most cases but its the best and takes the longest.... if you want to make it go fast, open taskman and turn the xvid4psp.exe process to low priorty and watch the encoding process shoot up too 99% ... the encoding process is done outside of Xvid4psp itself.. its just a gui to write avs scripts for people who don't know how
19/07/2008, 01:03 AM
Thanks Azumi!!! I'll do it right away!!!
19/07/2008, 01:28 AM
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
HE-ACC VBR @ 1.00 Max For the win
HE-ACC VBR @ 1.00 Max For the win
19/07/2008, 05:18 AM
My suggestions:
- Don't use exhaustive search - it does a pixel by pixel comparison and is totally unnecessary. Adds a LOT to encoding time, and has very little effect on size in general
- Use 2 reference frames (shame you can't use more)
- Don't use HE-AAC on the PSP - it doesn't support SBR, so it'll end up sounding worse. I'd use LC-AAC, VBR @ q0.2 or similar.
- I'd probably use constant quality over constant quantizer, but that's a bit of a choice to you
The main things you optimise are ME algorithm (use multi-hex) and SubME (use level 6 or 7).
- Don't use exhaustive search - it does a pixel by pixel comparison and is totally unnecessary. Adds a LOT to encoding time, and has very little effect on size in general
- Use 2 reference frames (shame you can't use more)
- Don't use HE-AAC on the PSP - it doesn't support SBR, so it'll end up sounding worse. I'd use LC-AAC, VBR @ q0.2 or similar.
- I'd probably use constant quality over constant quantizer, but that's a bit of a choice to you
The main things you optimise are ME algorithm (use multi-hex) and SubME (use level 6 or 7).
19/07/2008, 06:06 AM
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:My suggestions:
- Don't use exhaustive search - it does a pixel by pixel comparison and is totally unnecessary. Adds a LOT to encoding time, and has very little effect on size in general
- Use 2 reference frames (shame you can't use more)
- Don't use HE-AAC on the PSP - it doesn't support SBR, so it'll end up sounding worse. I'd use LC-AAC, VBR @ q0.2 or similar.
- I'd probably use constant quality over constant quantizer, but that's a bit of a choice to you
The main things you optimise are ME algorithm (use multi-hex) and SubME (use level 6 or 7).
heV2-aac works fine im using that using edited zinga settings
i do a 2 pass-quantizer extreme with it being 18 and 15 min
and hev2-aac at 20 works great
i advise you do azumi settings on a 2 pass extreme over-night depending on cpu
also exhaustive settings are where i never noticed them
19/07/2008, 06:10 AM
squee666 Wrote:heV2-aac works fine im using that using edited zinga settingsNo, the PSP doesn't decode SBR or PS, which makes HE-AAC fairly useless on the PSP.
squee666 Wrote:i do a 2 pass-quantizer extreme with it being 18 and 15 min18 is very high. In general, you shouldn't go below 20 unless you have ultra sharp eyes and always pay attention to every little detail on screen...
squee666 Wrote:also exhaustive settings are where i never noticed themME algorithm.
19/07/2008, 06:14 AM
ZiNgA BuRgA Wrote:squee666 Wrote:heV2-aac works fine im using that using edited zinga settingsNo, the PSP doesn't decode SBR or PS, which makes HE-AAC fairly useless on the PSP.
really ii encoded an episode of ef a tale of memories ended up 71mb and alot higher quality than with just a 2 pass bitrate
and i used hev2-aac vbr
didnt notice any difference in audio quality but file size
19/07/2008, 07:20 AM
squee666 Wrote:and i used hev2-aac vbrProbably an a voice video you won't notice too much difference, since SBR only replicates upper frequency ranges, and most voice operates in the lower frequency ranges.
didnt notice any difference in audio quality but file size
However, it will sound very similar to LC-AAC.
You will most likely notice a difference with music however (at lower bitrates (≤64kbps) at least).
Pages: 1 2